| Femi Ajayi's Outlook | ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Thursday, January 6, 2005
|
|
|
read a piece of disturbing news from one of the Nigerian Dailies, ThisDay, Saturday January 1, 2005, and made me wonder how the retired Military Generals underestimate the ability of Nigerians, and their thoughts about the role of the Military in the Nigeria political process, as we ushered in 2005. Retired General Marwa is of the opinion that "Aspiring Presidents Must Have Military Background." What a disgusting and troubling, but not a flabbergasted proclamation coming from the Military.
Reading the news item further, Marwa claims that "a person with the military background would have an edge over others", given what he described as the orientation and nature of training of military officers. By simple equation, it will allow them to loot the treasury and bastardize the Nigerian society once again. More disturbing about this statement is the claim that "he (Obasanjo) did not just walk into the Aso Rock villa". Which means that the approach of the Military in their intervention on the democratic process has been through the back door? Obasanjo was installed in 1999 and he turned around to install himself through the back door again, with massive rigging. Anambra confession and the court ruling on Ogun State 2003 election confirmed the backdoor politics of the Military. Some Nigerians are of the opinion that Marwa was a good Governor, who did not steal money. No one is accusing anyone of stealing money, but the question remains, Nigerians would like to know sources of his wealth after leaving Lagos State governorship. Once again, I am not saying he stole the public money, but how was he able to come up with his wealth to start an airline operation in Nigeria. Come on, did the money come from his retirement benefits, or was it from his savings, in Nigeria of very high class society, where public officials could spend their salaries in one day. Where is the savings coming from? Sources of wealth of the retired Generals that qualify them to lead Nigeria with their "leadership qualities" leave much puzzle for decent Nigerians to ponder about.
There have been some misconceptions about the political process in some advanced countries, especially the role of military service in aspiring for political positions, especially the Presidential candidates, in the United States. According to Marwa,
He went on to state that, The ways and manners Nigerians follow the United States democratic process leaves much to be desired. United States has matured over the years with its system, based on their environment and circumstances to institute their style of democracy. The system is not perfect yet, and it may never be perfect, but it is solid. The foundation of the United States system was based on their teething circumstances when they emigrated from Europe to settle in North America. Nigeria should fashion its own democratic style based on its culture, circumstances and environment. That is the only way by which Democracy can survive in Nigeria. It is not by mere copying the American system blindly, using military background for Presidential aspirants that would make Nigeria move forward in improving the lots of the people. In the process, Nigeria would be in a position to discard what is not needed and keep what is good for the country, from the American system. Marwa should note that, because USA uses military service as one of the criteria for selecting their leaders, does not mean that Nigeria should use that same yardstick. The circumstances are different. United States worked through the selection process, professionally, not through greed by which Nigerian Military approach their public service. I am not saying that no military man could vie for any position in the political process in Nigeria, but using that like fishing bait is not what Nigerians should accept. Nigerians should resist any military man becoming the next Nigerian President. Unfortunately, I see quit a number of butterflies in the veins of Nigerians, that could make them fall for any military person, who has the money. In a civilized society, Atiku should have been given the opportunity, because he has gone through the orientation with Obasanjo since 1999 till date. That does not mean that Atiku could not be challenged. Mind you, once again, nothing is wrong with any Nigerian aspiring for any political position in Nigeria. The military have bastardized the system, from all testimonies, their life styles, and arrogance in the society; they should 'step aside' from meddling with the democratic process for proper reform in Nigeria. The Oputa report has unveiled the Military dubious masks of governance and indignity. According to Oputa Commission's report, Synoptic Overview of Human Rights Violations Investigation Commission (HRVIC) Report: Conclusions and Recommendations, Section 1.52, p. 14, reveals that: "Military rule is absolute rule. It subverts and undermines the institutions of the State, imperceptibly initially but surely and gradually. It leads inevitably to moral and political corruption, alongside the decay of time-honoured loyalties and values as well as institutional decay. In due course and as a manifestation of this deepening decay, cruelty and murder become norms of governance. Good faith and truthfulness become childish scruples while force and craft become the keys to success. Selfishness, naked and unadorned, need only succeed to supply its own justification."
Section 88, p. 35, also states: Section 89, p. 35, reads: "It is plausible to argue that that in its heydays, military rule was indeed propelled by patriotism and the need to set Nigeria on a sound footing. Tragically, we all now know that things have worked differently. Military rule has left, in its wake, a sad legacy of human rights violations, stunted national growth, a corporatist and static state, increased corruption, destroying its own internal cohesion in the process of governing, and posing the greatest threat to democracy and national integration.
Section 90, p. 35 reacts: According to Oputa report, Babangida and Abdulsalami have some questions to answer about the death of Dele Giwa, and Abiola respectively. Here is what Oputa panel revealed in Chapter Three, Sections 97-100, pp. 88-89:
"Recommendations:
The report further revealed that during the Military rule in Nigeria, Amazingly, some Nigerians in Diaspora went to Minna to meet with General Babangida for vision 007. This act, especially by Nigerians in Diaspora is, to say the least despicable, nauseating, and pathetic. How did Babangida entertain his august visitors from the United States of America on Vision 007? He took them out for launch and every one of them paid for their meals. Maradona at his best game again, making a fool out of his august visitors, canvassing for him to run in 2007. It was my understanding that one of the delegates was ruined by Babangida when he worked for him, and migrated to the United States. When will Nigerians learn their lessons? Never! There are plenty of rooms at Aro Mental Hospital, Abeokuta, and Yaba Psychiatric Hospital, Lagos. My-sister-in-law, who is the Medical Director at Yaba Psychiatric Hospital, Lagos, would attend to these crops of Nigerians with mental dislocation to repair the damage to their reasoning faculty. If the retired Generals have those leadership skills as portrayed by General Marwa, to appear before the Human Rights Violations Investigation Commission was very hard for them. So Brig. Gen. Mohammed Marwa (rtd.) should not give Nigerians the option that Presidential aspirants SHOULD have military background. There is nothing wrong for him contesting for the Presidential position in Nigeria. I understand that he was a good man, a 'decent' Military Governor of Babangida's family of 'made in Minna' products. Did I promise not to be too critical of the Nigerian leaders in 2005, you bet. Have a good Year.
|